Jump to content

Talk:Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citation in second paragraph (ECP edit request)

[edit]

This could really use a citation:

The motivation behind the disengagement was described by Sharon's top aide as a means of isolating Gaza and avoiding international pressure on Israel to reach a political settlement with the Palestinians.

Here's an article that would work: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/07/israel

Per that article, I'd suggest editing the text as follows:

The motivation behind the disengagement was described by Sharon's top aide as a means of isolating Gaza and avoiding international pressure on Israel to reach a political settlement with the Palestinians, foreclosing the possibility of a Palestinian state.

Violet (talk) 22:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Archive 1: April 2005 - October 2006

Warnings about the consequesnes of the Disengagement

[edit]

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/319985/jewish/Gaza-

citation for first paragraph

[edit]

"Gaza Strip is still considered to be occupied under international law."

There's a citation needed flag on that sentence, although it contains a link to the page on "ICJ case on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories." An article that deals straight-forwardly with that issue is: Lisa Hajjar (14 July 2017) Is Gaza Still Occupied and Why Does It Matter?, Jadaliyya. Available at: https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/27557/Is-Gaza-Still-Occupied-and-Why-Does-It-Matter (Accessed: 7 February 2025). Others can be easily found using Google's Gemini AI tool.Marbux (talk) Marbux (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]